Consensus Spectrum

Four positions instead of two — because most decisions aren't yes or no

Agree

I support this. The proposal reflects what I want. I'm actively on board.

Reservations

I have concerns but can live with it. I'm not fully convinced, but I won't stand in the way.

Stand Aside

I disagree but won't block it. I don't want to participate in this decision, but I recognize the group's right to move forward.

Block

Fundamental objection. This violates our purpose, ground rules, or agreements. I'm asking the group to find another way.

Full support → Increasing concern →

Using the Spectrum at a Meeting

  1. Present the proposal clearly — what's being decided and why.
  2. Go around — each person states their position on the spectrum.
  3. Hear the reservations — ask people with reservations what would address their concern.
  4. Modify if needed — adjust the proposal based on what you hear.
  5. Test again — one more round. If no blocks, the decision is made.

When Someone Blocks

A block is rare and serious. It's not "I don't like this." It's "this would compromise something fundamental." A block must be grounded in the shared agreements the group has already written — not personal preference. "I'd prefer something different" is a reservation. "This would violate our purpose" is a block.

Consensus isn't unanimity. It's the absence of blocks grounded in shared agreements.